This is the official forum for the LXG team and community.


    Starcraft 2 Upgrades: Which, When, Why

    Share
    avatar
    NanManLXG
    Admin

    Posts : 215
    Join date : 2011-07-25
    Age : 29

    Starcraft 2 Upgrades: Which, When, Why

    Post  NanManLXG on Sat Aug 06, 2011 6:40 am

    By: Jeff June 9, 2011 from Gosu.com

    http://gosu.com/2011/06/starcraft-2-upgrades-which-when-why/

    I recently caught an excellent GSL Super Tournament match between the ever threatening TSL_aLive and the undeservingly Code B LeenockfOu. Alive opens with some scary looking 2rax aggression which Leenock thwarts with expert composure. From there, they game normalizes to your every day marine/tank vs muta/ling/bane. Leenock, however, utilizes a few subtle curve balls that differentiate him from your typical Zerg. Chief among these, he elected to research +1 flyer armor for his mutalisks very quickly instead of the more standard +1 attack.
    Leenock’s choice was more than a snap decision. It factored in to the long term army composition and resource distribution he’d determined would be most effective against what he felt he’d be facing. This got me thinking about the various factors that contribute to deciding when to upgrade what and why. Knowledge of these factors isn’t quite as foundational as say, understanding good macro, but it can provide the slight edge you need against an otherwise equally skilled opponent.
    Which upgrades are most important for me, and when should I get them?
    Answering the above question is far more complex that it initially seems. It depends largely on the answer to a series of smaller questions, and weighing their overall importance against one and other.
    What units will I be building?

    On a supremely basic level, knowing which upgrades are most effective for which units feels like it should be simple. Units with higher attack speed or double attacks, for instance, reap the benefit of an attack upgrade considerably more than units for focused on slower burst damage. It’s a percentage yield of DPS.
    Let’s do some math. A marine has an initial damage of 6 and fires at a rate of .86 seconds, making its initial DPS roughly 6.97 ((6 * 100)/86). The +1 upgrade raises that damage from 6 to 7 (an increase of ~16.67%), changing DPS to roughly 8.14. That’s a pretty substantial jump for just 100 min and 100 gas. Of course, the % yields decrease from 1 to 2 and 2 to 3, as is the case for all units.
    Forgetting about bonuses against armored, let’s compare that to the slower, heavier marauder. Marauders do an initial 10 dmg and fire at rate of once per 1.5 seconds, making their initial DPS a mere 6.67. Their +1 wep bonus yields a mere 10% bonus, increasing their DPS to 7.34.
    Based on this, it’s apparent that unit compositions with higher attack speed and lower initial damage will gain far more benefit from upgrading attack quickly than their more burst-damage oriented counterparts. In a vacuum, if you know you’re going to be building lots of Marines, Hydras, Phoenixes, Zealots, Zerglings, etc. then you want to consider upgrading attack first and fast.
    Of course, things in SC2 are often far from that simple. A multitude of situational factors can modify that seemingly straightforward rule. The next questions will address some of those.
    What units will my opponent be building?

    Let’s say your opponent is Terran and you scout 4 freshly build barracks, each equipped with a reactor. You know he/she is about to run a metric ton of marines down your throat. As effective as the attack upgrades discussed above are, armor upgrades cancel them out just as well. Likewise, Marines have a considerably low amount of health and a propensity to clump, making them more subsceptable to large, bursting AoE damage (siege tanks, fungals, storms, or banelings) instead of lower level potshots (zerglings or other marines). This is compounded by the presence of medivacs, which are far less effective against large explosive damage and far more effective at mitigating consistent damage over time.
    As such, upgrading armor against marines is almost guaranteed to yield more of a benefit than attack. Each point of armor is initially a ~16.67% reduction in overall marine DPS, and even if the marines at at +3 it’s still a reduction of over 10%. This is the logic that likely lead to Leenock’s decision vs Alive.
    Of course, there are also situations where what your opponent is producing should prompt you to quickly grab the +1 attack. For instance, large quantities of zerglings. Many units are built specifically so that an initial attack upgrade is absolutely devastating against lings, primarily the zealot and the roach.
    A zealot has an attack damage of (2x)8 every 1.2 seconds, while a roach has an attack damage of 16 every 2 seconds. Initially, it takes 3 full attacks (48 damage) for each of these units to kill 0/0 zerglings (35 total hp), which takes a zealot 3.6 seconds and a roach a full 6 seconds. Grabbing the +1 attack upgrade allows zealots and roaches to kill lings in 2 attacks (36 damage each), effectively improving their combat efficiency by a whopping 33%. Keeping these units 1 ahead of zerglings in upgrades yields one of the bigger advantages you can obtain in the game.The reverse is true for the Zerg player, keeping your armor ahead of your opponent’s attack upgrades is downright essential if you want to effectively use lings against roaches or zealots.
    Here are a few other useful tidbits on upgrade matchups:
    +1 armor on roaches vs immortals will make it take 4 shots instead of 3 to kill them (a ~33.34% increase in survivability)
    +1 armor on a queen vs harassing phoenixes will make it take 30 shots to kill instead of 22 (a ~36.36% increase in survivability)
    +1 attack on roaches will kill 0/0 siege tanks in 10 shots instead of 11 (~9.1% more efficient)
    +1 attack on stalkers will kill 0/0 mutalisks in 12 shots instead of 13 (~7.69% more efficient). Thanks to the Reddit-member who pointed out that Zerg regen kicks in immediately, meaning my initial numbers were slightly off.
    +1 attack on stalkers will kill 0/0 roaches in 11 shots instead of 12 (~8.34% more efficient)
    If anyone else discovers any other good ones, please feel free to post them in the comments.
    This final question is a bit more abstract, but is perhaps the most important of all:
    What is my play-style? (or how do I want to win?)

    There are plenty of different ways to play SC2: active vs passive, harassment vs deathball, offensive vs defensive, all in vs macro, etc. Each one of these styles can be enhanced by specific usage of upgrades. For example, let’s say you like to drop and drop a lot, doing quick damage and withdrawing before your opponent can suitably crush your hit squad. In that case, attack upgrades are your best friend. You want to kill off important tech structures and workers as quickly as humanly possible and, ideally, not do much of any direct fighting until you’ve already won yourself a substantial advantage.
    Conversely, let’s say you are a passive macro player who likes to slowly take the map while building up a larger and larger force. You may want to focus more on armor to give your units maximum lasting power until you’ve reached critical mass. Then you throw in a quick +1 attack before you roll your opponent with a maxed army.
    The overall point is that while a lot of what’s outlined in questions 1 and 2 seems clear cut, your personal play style and overall game plan creates a grey area which may influence your upgrading priorities. Before you do the math, make sure the math will WORK given what you want to accomplish. A pack of attack upgraded roaches may be great against zerglings, but it isn’t going to benefit you much if your opponent is using their lings in a series of small hit and runs and your roaches can’t keep up. You have to know you’re going to play in such a way that FORCES your opponent to submit to your better upgrades. That’s what a “plus one timing push” is all about.
    But wait, there’s more!

    Breaking down the full extent of how upgrades affect a given game scenario is a pretty epic process. There are a number of factors, including shields, bonus damage, AoE, etc. which I didn’t even begin to touch upon but are all valid and important. Please take the time to consider them when you start looking at ways in which your play could be enhanced by upgrade prioritization and optimization. If you discover anything I haven’t been able to touch upon, I do encourage you to post a comment.
    EDIT: A Redditor pointed me to this great TL thread as an additional resource.
    http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=187603


    Last edited by NanManLXG on Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:20 pm; edited 2 times in total


    _________________
    Who knew that explosions of pixels could inspire?

    Youtube.com/NanMan | Twitch.tv/TheRealNanMan | @TheRealNanMan
    avatar
    DocFletchLXG

    Posts : 47
    Join date : 2011-07-26
    Age : 29
    Location : Eugene Oregon/Winchester Virginia

    Re: Starcraft 2 Upgrades: Which, When, Why

    Post  DocFletchLXG on Sat Aug 06, 2011 5:30 pm

    makes sense... i wish i played terran Sad


    _________________
    The Doc is in...
    avatar
    NanManLXG
    Admin

    Posts : 215
    Join date : 2011-07-25
    Age : 29

    Re: Starcraft 2 Upgrades: Which, When, Why

    Post  NanManLXG on Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:21 pm

    DocFletchLXG wrote:makes sense... i wish i played terran Sad

    at least there is some good info for other match ups

    Here are a few other useful tidbits on upgrade matchups:
    +1 armor on roaches vs immortals will make it take 4 shots instead of 3 to kill them (a ~33.34% increase in survivability)
    +1 armor on a queen vs harassing phoenixes will make it take 30 shots to kill instead of 22 (a ~36.36% increase in survivability)
    +1 attack on roaches will kill 0/0 siege tanks in 10 shots instead of 11 (~9.1% more efficient)
    +1 attack on stalkers will kill 0/0 mutalisks in 12 shots instead of 13 (~7.69% more efficient). Thanks to the Reddit-member who pointed out that Zerg regen kicks in immediately, meaning my initial numbers were slightly off.
    +1 attack on stalkers will kill 0/0 roaches in 11 shots instead of 12 (~8.34% more efficient)

    don't forget to check out the link to the teamliquid post about upgrades http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=187603


    _________________
    Who knew that explosions of pixels could inspire?

    Youtube.com/NanMan | Twitch.tv/TheRealNanMan | @TheRealNanMan
    avatar
    DocFletchLXG

    Posts : 47
    Join date : 2011-07-26
    Age : 29
    Location : Eugene Oregon/Winchester Virginia

    Re: Starcraft 2 Upgrades: Which, When, Why

    Post  DocFletchLXG on Tue Aug 09, 2011 2:12 am

    yea i ;like that a little more


    _________________
    The Doc is in...
    avatar
    Cliff's Esports Corner

    Posts : 6
    Join date : 2011-10-06

    Re: Starcraft 2 Upgrades: Which, When, Why

    Post  Cliff's Esports Corner on Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:04 am

    Another general principle is that units your going to mass, say lings, will benefit more from attack upgrades than defense upgrade.

    10 lings fighting with 5 Marines, only 5 of the lings can be attacked at a time. So with good surround every one of the 10 lings would use attack upgrade, while only 5 at a time would use defense upgrade.

    Note this is in general, there are certainly exceptions.

    Other thing to keep in mind, I think, is that speed upgrade for lings or Blink for Stalkers is an upgrade just as much as Attack or Armor.

    It will often make sense to get Speed for lings or Blink for Stalkers before any attack/defense upgrade.

    Reminds me of another point, fast units will tend to benefit more from attack upgrades, because you will use their speed to keep them alive.


    Sponsored content

    Re: Starcraft 2 Upgrades: Which, When, Why

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Mon Sep 24, 2018 3:27 am